What role do environmental disaster in our eating habits, directly or indirectly? Our cuisine is composed of a thousand tricks: what is the consequence of each of them?
What is truly power environmentally friendly?
diet based on agricultural production more environmentally and humus layers of the ground? Yes, but not all. It would also, and especially a diet that meets the basic laws of a genuine ecological balance between man and nature, especially the natural laws that govern their molecular exchanges of all vital phenomena. And power that preserves the natural harmony of our physiological and psychological functioning, and their respective interactions with the environment.
But we are able to define what the natural diet of human beings?
Since nature and ecology in principle should go hand in hand, one might expect that a diet in accordance with the laws of nature in itself contributes to protecting the ecological balance. What makes the health of a species should produce the health of its habitat, and vice versa: life is a kind of logical, consistent with the principle of harmony arising from the laws of evolution. Organic farming, for example, is beneficial both for the health of consumers and the biosphere.
But distrust the hasty conclusions: for example say that it is enough to eliminate the consumption of meat because the ecological balance be restored. The relationship between feeding practices and the evolution of complexity are monstrous. Apparently, we know only a tiny part, and will therefore not be a stroke of great certainty that we will ensure the future of mankind and its habitat. Instead it will be constantly asking ourselves, going to see in detail what effects each can have Sgarro we do with the laws of nature, in all our fields of activities, including food.
systematic withdrawals made from one species into the environment as voraciously as the human species, his devouring hunger for energy and materials of all types, waste discharge in nature and you accumulate, the deleterious molecules out of the oven in the chemical industry, the improvisations of the new genetic manipulation sorcerer's apprentice, and a mountain of waste that ends up in landfills or composting, everything adds up and fits up to slowly disrupt the balance life on the planet.
Who can exclude that this tangled skein of interactions does not depend, directly or indirectly, by certain dietary errors typically human "civilized"? I bet some of you might find this idea a little 'chance.
A law of evolution can still serve as a reference: the different animal species existed for a long time. By definition, they are fed in accordance with the laws of nature. Their needs, their ways to pick the food they needed, they have developed over millions of years to ensure the individual a greeting and an optimal vitality: a necessary condition for survival and reproduction in the wild , full of fierce competition. And also to ensure the sustainability of the habitat in which species evolve, if it were not so, this habitat would be degraded, leading to the disappearance or the adaptation of species devastating. This will necessarily have developed the natural laws that link the ecological balance with the specific nutritional status of species: a diet that protects the environment must preserve the health and, reciprocally, that preserves the nutritional health must preserve the environment.
Also with regard to the human being, no one forbids us to imagine that a diet that respects the natural laws not only ensure optimal health, which also significantly decrease the pharmaceutical industry, but also to get rid of the false leads needs and destructive behaviors that threaten the environment.
course this is not a demonstration and not a postulate, but is only a hypothesis heuristic, that is a working hypothesis that can encourage us to ask questions, to pass in review and the eating habits that farming techniques inherited from our ancestors. These issues are rather unpleasant as it calls into question our ancestral traditions and a fragile economic balance.
Yet these ancient traditions can mask errors that we have not yet realized, the consequences of which are and may become even heavier than we realize. And perhaps these same economic balances are fragile because they are based on ignorance of natural laws.
So, I ask, what is truly natural diet? And what would its impact on ecology?
0 comments:
Post a Comment