The prim a part of this column was devoted to Jean Seignalet, but today I'll talk about another me say it has provided a classification of diseases on the basis that had never before been used, at least not in an equally organic : Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer. The biography of this doctor can read a bit 'up everywhere Int ernet, but I somehow doubt that you will find any source that can truly be considered objective, since the movement originated by Hamer aroused and still arouses reactions extremist and radical both by supporters and by opponents. I have no intention of discussing the validity of therapy Hamer, any of its allegations against the medical establishment and the Zionists. I'll take care only of his nosology, that is, its system of classification of human disease.
I start by saying that, although I have read a lot of Hamer and Hamer, I have not read it all, because he is still alive and in business: when I have a little 'time, in fact, I'll try to get hold of his later writings.
According to Hamer, the human disease should be classified according to the type of "biological conflict" to which they are associated. In my opinion, what triggers violent reactions against Hamer is not so much his intransigence (in fact, he categorically denied that other factors may be equally crucial in the genesis of diseases), because its ambiguity, although it has sincerely tried to define what conflicts in which biological and context should be framed, so far these concepts remain vague and subject to interpretation.
my part, I will try not to add further interpretation, but will attempt to simplify and disambiguate its vocabulary, which unfortunately we can not precisely define science.
"Conflict organic" are essentially the opportunities that life gives to itself in order to evolve. This seems to be something so mystical, and unfortunately it is! Apparently their performance depends on "everything" except by our will, fall upon us when we least expect them and disarm within a few fractions of a second all our defense and response mechanisms, precisely because they are responsible for disrupting our lives as effectively as possible.
Another revolutionary principle of Hamer concerns the way in which these "biological conflicts" are developed in practice: each of them, this creates certain changes in a "synchronic " in three distinct levels (but apparently closely related ) in the body, brain and psyche. The revolutionary aspect is not so much in the correlation between the organic and the psychological sphere, as in "synchronicity" means the way in which these processes take place, suggesting that it is not the result of a communication between mind, the brain and the body (as does the PNEI), but that changes in all three spheres occur "simultaneously".
According to Hamer, any biological conflict would immediately take what he calls a "program", which consists of several phases and stages: the initial shock, the active phase, the resolution of the exudative phase, the epileptic crisis, restoring the stage and finally the return to normal. Each of these moments and phases is characterized by certain events in the body, brain and psyche. So, summarizing, according to Hamer any disease depends on the type of conflict and the organic phase / time when there is a "program" triggered by the same biological conflict, as well as other factors such as gender (male or female) and lateral (right-handed or left-handed).
Conflicts biological basis of the "programs" in question are very different between them, but Hamer thinks he has done something good and right broadly classified into four categories depending on which part of cervollo is interested (sorry the irony, but if you read the writings of Hamer understand that often the explanations are a bit Hamer 'pulled by the hair, and that more attempts to simplify his thought makes it more messy, but you want to ... nobody's perfect!): we examine each of these four types of biological conflicts and diseases linked to them, according to Hamer.
1) Conflicts involving the formation of an edema in the brain stem (consisting of the bulb or medulla oblongata, the pons and midbrain): the keywords associated with these conflicts are "survival risk" "lack of an essential (food, light, sound, water, air or anything else that is perceived as essential)", "unable to use a key," "individual priorities," "life in danger" , "to be a refugee, being alone in the world." The diseases associated with these conflicts relate to the tissues derived dall'endoderma: adenocarcinoma (renal, bronchioloalveolar, prostate, esophagus, duodenum, liver, colon, bladder ...), adenomas (esophageal, thyroid, polyps ...), water retention, seminoma, teratoma, nodules goiter and thyroid, pancreatic cysts, tuberculosis, mycosis, pulmonary emphysema, Crohn's disease, paralytic ileus ...
2) Conflicts involving the formation of an edema in the cerebellum : keywords associated with these conflicts are "protect", "defend themselves against a direct attack on our physical or moral integrity." The diseases associated with these conflicts affect tissues derived from mesoderm old: melanoma, tuberculosis, leprosy, breast adenocarcinoma (nodules / cysts, breast cancer), mesothelioma, ascites, anti-social ...
3) Conflicts involving the formation of edema in white matter of the brain: the keywords associated with these conflicts are "strengthening the individual or group", "need to grow," "fail to do something, "" suffer a devaluation, "" feel inadequate, "" not being equal. " The diseases associated with these conflicts affect tissues derived from mesoderm Latest: boils, abscesses, bacterial and viral infections, cellulitis, arthritis, tendonitis, sarcomas, polio, muscular dystrophy, osteoporosis, anemia, osteomyelitis, leukemia, gout, periodontal disease, Addison's disease, varicose veins, Cysts (ovarian, renal ...), endometriosis, hydrocele, megalomania ...
4) Conflicts involving the formation of edema in gray matter of the brain (ie cerebral cortex and midbrain): the keywords associated with these conflicts are "integrated into the life of the group," report with others "," fighting for territory, for the family or the nest, "to suffer a separation, the lack of contact," "feelings of frustration or emotional castration of sex," "identity conflict", "act or fixed assets "," insensitivity or hypersensitivity, "" suffering or happiness. "The diseases associated with these conflicts affect tissues derived dall'ectoderma: caries, viral infections, cataracts, keratitis, conjunctivitis, psoriasis, dermatitis, eczema, atopic dermatitis, keratin, urticaria, vitiligo, alopecia , dandruff, bronchial carcinoid, small cell lung, asthma, cough, intraductal breast cancer (breast cancer), fibromyalgia, rheumatism, epilepsy, numbness, paralysis, neuralgia, headaches, migraines, insomnia, heart disease, coronary artery disease, abdominal pain, peptic ulcer , I and II diabetes, thyroid carcinoma, large cell lymphoma, cysts euthyroid, phobia, depression, mythomania, nymphomania, aggression, anorexia, autism, paranoia, bulimia ...
hamer system lends itself to some criticism easy:
- the division of embryogenic embryogenic Hamer does not correspond to the division normally accepted by science, such as the mammary gland is not derived from the mesoderm, but old dall'ectoderma , or the prostate is not derived from the mesoderm dall'endoderma but recently, Hamer and also does not take into account the very germ of the neural crest.
- hameriana the verifiability of the diagnosis, so widely Hamer himself against his detractors, is based on the examination of reports of CT (without contrast) on these TAC Hamer would be able to systematically identify some special shapes (referred to as "on target") that would confirm his thesis: a pity that radiologists who have the courage to give him reason you count on tips of the fingers of one hand ...
- Hamer's thesis may be considered too simplistic, but remember that the thesis of Dr. Franz Joseph Gall's phrenology they were, but despite this, Gall was considered the father of modern neuropsychology. In my view, is that Gall Hamer in the basic principle is correct, but is interpreted as extreme and unscientific.
- Hamer said that would be used by microorganisms in order to complete the "programs" triggered by biological conflicts. This could also be acceptable, but the breakdown of the types of microorganisms and tissues using it and completely inaccurate. Hamer says for instance that the mycobacteria would be used only dall'endoderma mesoderm and the old, while it is known that tuberculosis attacks the bones, joints and lymphatic system. Hamer also said that viruses are only used by the tissues of the ectoderm and mesoderm recently, while we know that the intestine can be affected by Rotavirus, Reovirus and the dall'Adenovirus, and skin may be attacked by the HHV8 virus (which causes Kaposi's sarcoma).
Nevertheless, in my opinion, the nosology hameriana remains a very important discovery for understanding the disease, if only to explain what the liquid medicine as "vegetative dystonia " when it has the courage to admit that sometimes our bodies "freak out" and no longer behaves as expected from him.
0 comments:
Post a Comment